Madrid, Spain, August 17, 2023.  Innventik is honored to announce that Dr. Walter Ramirez (Innventik) has been confirmed as Speaker, and will be presenting at this year’s Thermoplastic World Summit TPE-2023 (28-29 November 2023, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Dr. Ramirez will share Innventik’s view on Sustainable Design in TPEs through advanced Process Technology and Bio-based raw materials:

• Process technologies for sustainability in polymer production operations (i.e. raw materials purification, reactor design, polymer recovery, direct devolatilization, energy efficiency).
• Optimization of production processes using data analytics and machine learning.
• Recent advancements in technologies to obtain Bio-based monomers and other raw materials (i.e. Bio-Butadiene)

The TPE World Summit brings together manufacturers, processors, end-users, designers, and researchers for a summit-style technical discussion of silicone and TPE elastomer materials, global markets, processing advancements, and novel applications.

More information at:

https://www.elastomer-forum.com/tpe-elastomers-world-summit

Innventik Consulting has performed a Technology Intelligence analysis and issued updated reports for the following Technologies for Plastics and Thermoplastic Elastomers Recycling:

• Mechanical Recycling Processes
• Dissolution (Solvent-Based) Technologies
• Depolymerization Technologies
• Thermal Cracking Technologies

Innventik Engineering has also engaged in the design (engineering) of new plants for Plastics Recycling, applying different technologies and types of processes, depending on the type of waste. We are familiar with the main Technologies, the main Players, and the relevant legislation.

There is a strong need for ad-hoc Plastic Recycling Technologies.

There is a need for reliable information and for economical processes for Plastics Recycling. It is a challenging, long-term business opportunity that is having the demand and support from society, governments, and organizations. Sustainability practices have existed for a long time, but COVID pandemic reignited the interest and need for implementing these technologies at all levels. Plastic waste has come to dominate the outlook for the whole plastics industry. Polymer producers and technology companies are now turning to the overwhelming task to analyze the different recycling technologies. The circularity of plastics has risen rapidly up the agenda for the whole global plastics industry. Campaign groups have tried to highlight the problem of plastic waste in the environment for many years, but it only cut through to the public in 2018 with the media coverage of plastic pollution in oceans and on beaches. The problem of what to do about waste plastics remains just as strong. The European Union responded with actions including its Plastics Strategy, with medium-term targets for reducing plastics waste and more immediate action to ban plastics in certain single-use items. The problem has been recognized all over the world and many countries have implemented or are implementing regulations. China’s ban on most plastic waste imports was followed by other Asian countries. A key approach to the problem is circularity, which encompasses a reduction in material usage and the recycling of materials so that loops are crated in material production and use, thereby cutting the amount of waste. Materials suppliers, recycling players, Fast-Moving Consumer Goods products sold quickly and relatively cheaply, multinational brand owners, and packaging manufacturers, are all actively reducing virgin plastics and increasing recycled plastics in packaging.

Mechanical Recycling.

Plastics packaging is the major focus for most companies in the plastics industry, because of the huge volumes of packaging waste and because this is where the social concern is the greatest. Mechanical recycling is a more established transformation route for waste plastics, and it has the advantage of being a cheaper and less energy-intensive process than chemical recycling. But current small capacities for mechanical recycling are not enough to deliver the huge tonnage of recycled plastics that are necessary to meet regulatory and corporate targets. This is where large-scale polymer producers believe they can step in and help. Collection, sorting issues with degradation and contamination limiting packaging applications are the main challenges for mechanical recycling.

Dissolution Technologies.

Dissolution Technologies are common technologies for the recycling of Polystyrene (PS), Polyolefins (PO), PVC, PET, with differences on the selected solvents to dissolve the polymer from the mixed waste, allowing insoluble contaminants such as fillers and pigments to be filtered out. These technologies are usually developed internally with the support of engineering firms, and processing equipment manufacturers. This type of technology requires engineering design and needs to prove economic feasibility plus scaling.

Depolymerization Technologies.

This type of technology is certainly a chemical recycling process, typically using heat and often a catalyst, to convert a polymer back to its building block monomers – for this reason, it is sometimes referred to as “monomer recovery process”. It is most suitable for use with step-growth polymers such as PET which are polymerized by condensation but can be applied to Polystyrene. This type of technology requires engineering design and needs to prove economic feasibility plus scaling.

Thermal Cracking Technologies.

This type of technology converts waste plastic and other contaminants back to basic feedstock components (i.e., Hydrocarbons, syngas. Two processes are used to thermally crack polymers: pyrolysis cracks the polymer chain at high temperatures in the absence of oxygen; gasification heats the polymer with a controlled but limited amount of oxygen. Both yield a different mix of end products with targeted applications ranging from fuels to different chemical feedstocks. In general, conventional pyrolysis thermal cracking is a simple technology that can be applied for mixed plastics, PO, PS, and when sorting and classification are difficult to achieve. This type of technology requires engineering design and needs to prove economic feasibility plus scaling.

CONCLUSIONS. 

• An average consumer today uses at least 50 items a day that depend on plastics for their functionality and performance. With global polymer demand passing 300 million tons in 2021, the plastics processing industry is thriving in most countries, but the industry is also facing new challenges, particularly in more developed markets including the US, Europe, and North-East Asia. Plastic pollution has become a global environmental issue and one that is currently receiving much media attention steering an anti-plastic movement in society.
• A very important driver is legislation limiting or prohibiting the use of virgin fossil fuel-based plastics in different industries.
• Brands and packaging manufacturers setting sustainability targets is another important driver.
• Many technologies and solutions for plastics recycling are available. There is no one solution that fits all.

Source: Innventik Technology Intelligence Key Report. RELEVANT TECHNOLOGIES FOR PLASTICS RECYCLING. (2023)

Do you have Oil Absorption or related Surface Appearance problems?

Do your pellets have a greasy or sticky surface after compounding?

Do you have agglomeration during packaging?

Do you have to feed free-flowing issues?

After a few days, does the greasy aspect appears again?

Oil absorption occurs by a diffusion-absorption process which is a function of temperature, oil composition, and polymer characteristics. Good porosity is required to absorb oil well in the compounding process. This article summarizes some of the steps to be undertaken during the elastomer manufacturing process or during the compounding formulation and processing process, based on Innventik’s experience performing assessments on this type of issue.

OIL ABSORPTION IMPROVEMENT DURING THE ELASTOMER MANUFACTURING PROCESS.

High molecular weight polymers (i.e. SEBS) are more prone to oil absorption problems and also to exhibit surface appearance issues. The leading causes that influence Oil Absorption and Surface Texture are related to the crumb’s physical form and characteristics, which depend on variables controlled during the Reaction, Polymer Recovery, and/or Drying Processes. An assessment of the process is required to evaluate the root causes, the extent and source of the problem(s), and the measures for improvement. The main goal is to identify the most favorable process synthesis, polymer recovery, and processing conditions to obtain the ideal crumb form, crumb density, particle size, and particle size distribution, for optimum crumb porosity.

OIL ABSORPTION IMPROVEMENT DURING COMPOUNDING FORMULATION AND PROCESSING.

In the case of SEBS, high-viscosity paraffinic oils with viscosities of 70-100 cst (40ºC) can be used. The blending of the elastomer with the polymer (i.e. Polypropylene) can be performed at standard conditions, using high or low-speed blenders, ensuring complete absorption.

FAST METHOD TO EVALUATE OIL ABSORPTION.

Procedure:

• Blend 100-200 g of rubber and 30-60 g of white oil in a container with manual stirring
• Allow to stand for 5 min.
• Blend again manually.
• Allow to stand for 10-15 min.
• If the result is not good, allow standing for 10-15 min.

Observations:

• Excellent Oil Absorption: Crumbs or pellets without any material held to the bottom of the container but with crumbs that stick to the wall.  Crumbs held to the wall only.
• Good Oil Absorption: Very few crumbs or pellets without any material held to the bottom of the container.
• Bad Oil Absorption: Most of the crumbs are held to the bottom and to the walls of the container that can be easily separated with stirring
• Worst Oil Absorption: A very oily cluster of crumbs, held to the walls that can be easily separated with stirring.

If you are interested in improving surface appearance, oil absorption (rate of oil absorption or polymer capability of incorporating a higher amount of oil), please share your challenge and  contact Innventik.

Author: Walter Ramirez (walter@innventik.com)
Date: 2023-05-21

Madrid, March 2023. Innventik has announced the release of its “Technology Approaches for Polymer Modification of m-ABS and HIPS Report 2023“. The report addresses the synthesis-structure-property-performance relations for the synthesis of in-situ polymerization of continuous mass Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene polymers (ABS) and High Impact Polystyrene (HIPS). The report includes the fundamentals for the synthesis and structure of Low Cis Polybutadiene Rubber (LCBR) and Solution Styrene Butadiene Rubber (SSBR) used for Rubber Toughening and addresses mechanical blending approaches and key information from market applications, users. and innovation trends. Innventik is a Consulting and Engineering company that has a team of experts that provides services to companies around the world with process improvements, engineering (FEL2, FEL3), Technology-Market Intelligence in Rubber, Elastomers, and Polymer Modification (ABS, HIPS).

The contents of the Technology Report are:

• MODULE 1:  DESIGN PARAMETERS
• MODULE 2:  RUBBER SELECTION CRITERIA
• MODULE 3:  ROLE OF RUBBER TYPE AND PERFORMANCE
• MODULE 4:  m-ABS AND HIPS PROCESSES AND PROPERTIES
• MODULE 5:  INNOVATION TRENDS & PATENT ANALYSIS
• MODULE 6:  IN-SITU POLYMERIZATION KINETICS
• MODULE 7:  ANIONIC POLYMERIZATION DESIGN OF LCBR & SSBR
• MODULE 8:  ALKYL-LITHIUM INITIATORS
• MODULE 9:  MOLECULAR WEIGHT & DISTRIBUTION
• MODULE 10:  MICROSTRUCTURE OF POLYDIENES
• MODULE 11:  RUBBER TOUGHENING WITH BLENDS
• MODULE 12:  MECHANICAL BLENDING APPROACHES 
• MODULE 13:  KEY INFORMATION FROM MARKET, CUSTOMERS, USERS
• MODULE 14:  ABS AND HIPS MARKET INSIGHTS

FREE ACCESS TO INNVENTIK EXPERTS.

All report purchases include free access for up to 30 min. phone time with the expert, who will help you link key findings in the report to the technical, market, or application issues you are addressing. Also available as Mastercourse (online or in-house training format).

ORDERING INFORMATION

□   Electronic (unlimited users): 4995€

• An electronic pdf version of a fully illustrated report, +380 pages, PDF format, will be delivered after payment.
• An Excel database with active links to access individual patents is included in the package.

To request more information or a copy of this report, training, consulting, or engineering.

Email: walter@innventik.com

Phone: +34 628859711 (Europe CST)

DETAILED CONTENTS

MODULE 1: DESIGN PARAMETERS IN THE SYNTHESIS OF m-ABS & HIPS
• Types of Processes to obtain m-ABS and HIPS
• Rubber Toughened Plastics Morphology
• Mechanism of particle Formation and Morphology
• Effect of Graft or Block Copolymer on Morphology
• Impact-Gloss balance with Rubber Particle Size
• Materials Science Concepts of Rubber Toughened Polymers
• Role of Rubber Type and Characteristics
• Key points

MODULE 2: RUBBER SELECTION CRITERIA FOR m-ABS AND HIPS
• Rubber Selection Parameters
• Role of Rubber Type and Characteristics
• Typical Rubber Specification for HIPS
• Solution Viscosity Relevance
• Screening rubbers for colors
• Plant Trials

MODULE 3: ROLE OF RUBBER TYPE AND PERFORMANCE
• Review of Plastics Testing
• Review of Polymerization Process
• Polymer Structure
• Key Control Properties
• Factors that control Properties and challenges

MODULE 4: m-ABS AND HIPS PROCESSES AND PROPERTIES
• Main processes
• Comparison of technologies
• Major processing methods

MODULE 5: m-ABS AND HIPS INNOVATION TRENDS AND PATENT ANALYSIS
• Technology Strategies of major players
• Key parameters to control performance
• Novel processes (HIPS, TIPS, CRP)
• Recent advances in Polymer Modification
• Patent analysis, key technologies and trends

MODULE 6: IN-SITU POLYMERIZATION KINETICS
• Polymerization of Styrene in Rubber
• Kinetics and initiators (diradical initiation)

MODULE 7: ANIONIC POLYMERIZATION DESIGN OF LCBR AND SSBR
• Basic concepts in anionic polymerization
• Types of solvents
• Controlling Molecular weight and distribution
• Block Copolymers
• Radial Polymers
• Functionalization

MODULE 8: STRUCTURE OF ALKYL-LITHIUM INITIATORS
• Structure of alkyl-lithium initiators
• Initiation and propagation

MODULE 9: MOLECULAR WEIGHT AND DISTRIBUTION
• Methods
• Styrene-Butadiene Copolymers analysis

MODULE 10: MICROSTRUCTURE OF POLYDIENES
• Microstructure and characterization
• Addition of Lewis Basis
• Polar Modifiers
• Coupling Agents
• Poisons
• Copolymerization control

MODULE 11: RUBBER TOUGHENED m-ABS & HIPS WITH RUBBER BLENDS
• BR and SSBR Blends cases
• Key points

MODULE 12: MECHANICAL BLENDING APPROACHES FOR ABS & HIPS
• Rheology of miscible blends
• Comparative Morphologies
• Results of mechanical blending (blend and graft types)
• Properties of the matrix

MODULE 13: KEY INFORMATION FROM MARKET, CUSTOMERS, USERS
• Designing new products based on unmet needs
• Differentiation ideas

MODULE 14: ABS AND HIPS MARKET INSIGHTS
• General market overview of ABS
• General market overview of Polystyrene

Madrid, February 2023.  Innventik has released the “Thermoplastic Polyurethanes (TPU) Market-Technology Intelligence Report”. TPUs are, in general, high molecular weight linear polymers that exhibit room temperature elastomeric properties and are thermoplastic. TPU offers exceptional benefits by bridging the gap between flexible rubber and rigid plastics. They come in several forms, from molding and extrusion resins, spandex fibers, extruded film and sheet, and solution resins (which serve the coating and adhesives industries and aqueous dispersions. This report is focused exclusively on TPUs for Molding and Extrusion, which includes TPU in blends and alloys, but excludes resins used in films and sheets.

The global consumption of TPU in 2022 for the referred segment, accounted for about 670KTon, valued at over 3.2BUSD.

Innventik uses internal information, databases, and materials available in its files. Innventik has access to advanced intelligence software to access collections of published information, and public records including market and technological. The data extracted from various methods and logical alignments is vali-dated with primary interviews and macroeconomic indicators analysis.  Innventik has a strong network of contacts and performed phone interviews with the major TPU manufacturers.

Innventik‘s approach to this TPU Basic market Intelligence Report consisted in contacting specialized companies in TPUs, and also compounders and users. The information provided was processed, analyzed, and used to update and corroborate Innventik‘s market information databases on TPUs, from where the in-formation was extracted for this report.

If you are interested, please contact Innventik (info@innventik.com; info@innventik.com; +34-2628859711).

CONTENTS

 

1. TPU MARKET INTELLIGENCE APPROACH.

2. TPU GLOBAL MARKET.

2.1 GLOBAL TPU MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH.

2.2 REGIONAL TPU MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH.

2.3 TPU AVERAGE PRICES.

2.4 TPU MARKET SEGMENTATION.

2.5 TPU RAW MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS.

2.6 TPU MARKET REQUIREMENTS.

2.7 MAIN TPU MARKET TRENDS.

2.8 TPU INTERMATERIAL COMPETITION.

3. TPU MARKET APPLICATIONS.

3.1 AUTOMOTIVE.

3.2 WIRE & CABLE (SHEATHING AND JACKETING).

3.3 HOSE & TUBING.

3.4 WHEELS & CASTERS.

3.5 INDUSTRIAL-MECHANICAL-TRANSPORTATION.

3.6 FOOTWEAR-SPORTS-RECREATIONAL.

3.7 GEOPHYSICAL-OIL-MINING.

3.8 AGRICULTURAL.

3.9 BIOMEDICAL OR MEDICAL.

3.9.1 Regulations for Medical Applications

3.10 TEXTILE COATINGS.

3.11 BLENDS-IMPACT MODIFICATION.

3.12 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS.

4. PROCESSING OF TPUS.

4.1 GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT PROCESSING.

4.2 INJECTION MOLDING OF TPU PROCESSING GUIDE.

4.2.1 Drying.

4.2.2 Injection Molding Machine.

4.2.3 Screw Design.

4.2.4 Nozzles, Sprues, Runners.

4.2.5 Gates.

4.2.6 Mold Design.

4.2.7 Venting.

4.2.8 Part Ejection.

4.2.9 Mold Temperature.

4.2.10 Annealing.

4.2.11 Miscellaneous

5. MAIN COMPANIES.

5.1 OVERVIEW OF TPU PRODUCERS.

5.2 LUBRIZOL.

5.3 COVESTRO.

5.4 HUNTSMAN.

5.5 BASF.

5.6 UBE.

6. REFERENCES.

7. APPENDIX TECHNOLOGY INTELLIGENCE TUPU OVERVIEW.
   

• Innovation Profile
• Simple Legal Status
• Patent Type
• Technology Life Cycle
• Geographic Territories
• Application Trend in Countries of Origin
• Top Countries
• Application Trend in Top Countries
• IP5 Territory Distribution
• Top Chinese Provinces and Applications
• Key Technologies
• Application Trend of Key Technologies
• Geographic Distribution of Key Technologies
• Top Assignees of Key Technologies
• dAssignee Analysis
• Assignee Overview
• Top Assignees
• Assignee Concentration
• New Entrants
• Assignee Relationships
• Technology focus of Top Assignees
• Application Trend of Top Assignees
• Geographic Distribution of Top Assignees
• Cell Diagram
• Inventor Analysis
• Top Inventors
• Application Trend of Inventors
• Analyze inventor partnerships
• Key Patents
• Most Cited Patents
• Largest Invention Families
• Most Claim-Heavy Patents
• Most Litigated Patents
• Market Valued Patents
• Value Overview
• Portfolio Value Distribution
• Technology Area Benchmark
• Highest Market-Valued Patents
• Licensing Deals
• Patent Litigation Overview
• Innovation Word Clouds
• Innovation Word Cloud
• Wheel of Innovation
• Technology Landscaping

LIST OF FIGURES.

Figure 1. Market Intelligence Approach

Figure 2. TPU Global Market (KTon, 2022)

Figure 3. TPU Global Market (BUSD, 2022)

Figure 4. Global TPU Market Demand by Region (%, 2022)

Figure 5. Western Europe TPU Market Demand (%, 2022)

Figure 6. Asia Pacific TPU Market Size (2017-2028, USD Million)

Figure 7. TPU Global Average Price (2022)

Figure 8. TPU Global Market Share in Percentage Molding and Extrusion (2022).

Figure 9. TPE Cycle Positions, including TPUs.

Figure 10. Innventik’s classification of Thermoplastic Elastomers (TPE) families.

Figure 11. TPU Global Market Share in KTon by Application (2022).

Figure 12. Automotive Interior parts where TPUs compete with other TPEsR

Figure 13. Main TPE Polymers used in Wire and Cable Engineering

Figure 14. TPU Footwear applications

Figure 15. TPU (TPE-V) for Healthcare applications

Figure 16. TPU for nonwoven fabrics for gowns, drapery, and tubing.

Figure 17. Global TPU Producers capacity (670KTon)

Figure 18. of NHFR Grades Comparison – Key attributes (source: Lubrizol)

Figure 19. Lubrizol Grades Shore A Hardness.

Figure 20. Lubrizol grades Elongation tests (ambient conditions)

Figure 21. Lubrizol grades Glass Transition Temperature

Figure 22. Lubrizol Grades DMA G‘ Modulus at <50ºC

Figure 23. Lubrizol Grades Elongation at Break.

Figure 24. Self Extinguising (V0) as per UL 94 Vertical Burn Test

Figure 25. Long Term Heat Ageing Performance for Lubrizol  Estane TS92AP7

Figure 26. Covestro Nomenclature and key to Desmopan grades

Figure 27. Covestro Comparison of properties in the Desmopan product series

Figure 28. Covestro Product Range by shore hardness and raw material basis

Figure 29. Total shrinkage for Huntsman TPU grades in relation to wall thickness and Shore Hardness.

Figure 30. Hydrolysis resistance of ether and ester grades.

Figure 31. UV Radiation Resistance of Huntsman TPU.

Figure 32. Isochronous stress-strain lines at 23ºC Elastollan C85A.

Figure 33. Coefficient of thermal expansion Alpha (1/K), for various Elastollan hardnesses (ester grades)

Figure 34. Heat deflection temperature (HDT) according to DIN EN ISO 75 method B for Elastollan TPU

Figure 35. UBE TPU Grades for resistance to several harsh conditions.

LIST OF TABLES.

Table 1. Global TPU Market (2022, KTon)

Table 2. Global Growth (% CAGR, 2020-2025)

Table 3. Global TPU Market Demand by Region in percentage, KTon and MUSD (2022)

Table 4. Western Europe TPU Market Demand in percentage, KTon and MUSD (2022)

Table 5. TPU by Type of Processing (2022)

Table 6. Raw Materials requirements for TPU Elastomers (KTon, 2022)

Table 7. TPEs and Elastomers based on Renewable Raw Materials (examples)

Table 8. Intermaterial Competition among Flexible Polymers

Table 9. Consumption of various TPUs and Additive in Automotive Applications.

Table 10. The relative importance of TPEs in Automotive target applications and parts.

Table 11.  Drying recommendations for time and temperature

Table 12. Typical injection molding processing temperatures of TPU materials are as follows

Table 13. New halogen-free, flame-retardant grades for EV charging cables

Table 14. UL 94 Vertical Burn Test Results.

Table 15. Huntsman TPU Irogran grades resistance properties.

Table 16. BASF TPU Grades Nomenclature.

Table 17. BASF TPU Elastollan Portfolio.

Table 18. UBE Eternalast TPU Series Main Performance Features.

Table 19. UBE Eternalast TPU Series Physical Properties.a

Madrid, Spain, February 2023.  The MasterClass “Styrene Block Copolymers (SBCs) in Adhesive Application” given online by Dr. Walter Ramirez (Innventik) through Technobiz Professional Education, will allow you to have a deep understanding of the fundamental science behind adhesive mechanisms, the interactions of the ingredients, to optimize formulations, to make better decisions in your day-to-day work, linking your formulation issues with their root causes, for SBCs Hot Melt and Solvent Based Adhesives.

This Masterclass is addressed to professionals who are willing to increase their knowledge of SBCs in Hot Melts and in Solvent Based Adhesives. I will cover the fundamental science of adhesion for SBCs, the characterization methods, the types, and roles of the ingredients to optimize performance, the main requirements for specific applications, the formulation basics with multiple reference applications, and an overview of the future trends and drivers in SBCs.

SUMMARY OF MODULES.

MODULE 1: Fundamentals of Adhesion for SBCs.

Basic principles, mechanisms, and theory of adhesion, including the role of the interphase in adhesion, the relevance of surface wetting, and the models for adhesion.

MODULE 2: ADHESIVES CHARACTERIZATION.

Overview of the main techniques including structural, Tack tests, Peeling tests, Shear tests, Mechanical Fatigue, Thermal, surface properties, rheological and viscoelastic.

MODULE 3: COMPONENTS IN ADHESIVES FORMULATIONS.

Base Polymers, waxes, hardeners, fillers, solvents, adhesion promoters or primers, stabilizers (like antioxidants, anti-ozonants, anti-hydrolysis, UV protectors), Biocides, plasticizers, and tackifiers.

MODULE 4. OVERVIEW OF SBCs IN ADHESIVE APPLICATIONS.

Review of the main structures, characteristics, and features of SBCS, including countertypes, typical properties, general benefits and disadvantages, and a general review of SBC value proposition in different applications, in Pressure Sensitive Adhesives, Hot Melts, and Solvent based.

MODULE 5. FORMULATION BASICS OF SBCs ADHESIVES.

Presenting a Formulations Design Approach to Engineer Properties for specific adhesive requirements, The Adhesives Formulations Basics, and a Formulations Reference Guide for multiple adhesives applications.

To improve performance and cost-effectiveness in labels, packaging, construction, automotive,

Formulations and ingredients selection to achieve specific performance, strength, flexibility, and durability.

MODULE 6. Future Trends and Drivers in SBCs.

Global market overview of SBCs, an analysis of the Global Sustainability Challenges in the industry, the main trends in Adhesives Performance, some synergies and Innovation Opportunities that we identify, and a list of Future Trends that will impact the SBC adhesives industry.

REGISTRATION.

You can register at:  http://www.knowhow-webinars.com  (http://www.knowhow-webinars.com)

INNNVENTIK TECHNOLOGY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2022: SOLUTION SSBR FUNCTIONALIZED (SSBR-F) TECHNOLOGIES FOR HIGH-PERFORMANCE TIRES.

Author: Dr. Walter Ramirez (Chief Innovation Officer, Innventik S.L.)

1. BASIC CONCEPTS, MARKET OVERVIEW, DRIVERS.

Tires using SSBR & SSBR-F reduce Rolling Resistance and are in high demand by Tire producers and Automakers because they make vehicles more fuel efficient, reducing greenhouse gasses. The main drivers for the demand for SSBR and SSBR-F are: (a) Environmental regulations and voluntary commitments to reduce the greenhouse effect are major drivers of innovation in tires, demand for SSBR-F; (b) Sustainability is top of mind for automakers and customers are shifting preferences to tires with better properties; (c)  Electric Vehicles and Autonomous Driving Vehicles require Low Rolling Resistance; (d) The use of SSBR-F improves further the low rolling resistance, fuel efficiency and reduction of CO2 emissions.

2. Introduction: SSBR for High-Performance Tires (HPT).

SSBR use in Tires is expanding as low rolling resistance tread applications increase into both high and mid-performance consumer tires as well as commercial tires. The portfolio of products for the global tire market is expanding towards High-Performance tires. To reduce emissions targets, automotive manufacturers must reduce a vehicle’s emissions during its life span. Tire manufacturers are targeting LRR & HPT, as reflected in the market & technology trends. LRR relevance has increased worldwide because of an eco-friendly fuel consumption reduction, and CO2 emissions trend. The report reviews the basic concepts for High-Performance Tires (HPT), regulations, Magic Triangle Low Rolling Resistance challenges and design parameters.

There is an overcapacity of SSBR in Asia Pacific, demand declined in all regions since 2020, but it is expected to stabilize and to reach 2020 levels by 2024.

3. SSBR Functionalization Strategies.

SSBR Functionalization strategies include Chain end Functionalization (Omega-Functionalized, Alfa-Functionalized, Alfa-Omega Functionalized) and Along Chain Functionalization. Specific technology for tailored macrostructures and a full range of polymer microstructures (Tg). are being designed, with multiple functionality variations. End-chain Functionality products are still the dominant products in the market. Functionalization along the chain (and combined) improves the efficiency of dispersion of silica and carbon-black but might generate collateral issues with crosslinking and filler interaction. The use of chemical coupling improves processing and performance balance. Oil extension for a mix of tire performance and processing properties is relevant.

4. SSBR-F Relevant Technologies and Companies.

The technology dashboards for SSBR-F Technologies and Companies (Trinseo, Michelin, Bridgestone, Continental, Goodyear, Arlanxeo, JSR and Asahi, Nippon Zeon, Sumitomo, TSRC, Versalis, Kumho) are analyzed (i.e. Innovation Rate, Annual Technology Filing Strategies, Most Cited Patents, Highest Market Valued Patents, Cell Diagrams, Technology Landscape Maps, Relevant Technologies, per company).

ORDERING INFORMATION

To request a copy of this report:

info@innventik.com

Europe: +34 628859711

□ Electronic (unlimited users within the same company): 15000,00€

An electronic pdf version of a fully illustrated report, +500 pages, PDF format, will be delivered after payment. An Excel database (Publication No., Title, Abstract, Publication Date, Standard Current Assignee, Inventors, IPC, No. of Cites within 5 years), with active links to access individual patents, is included in the package.

FREE ACCESS TO INNVENTIK EXPERTS

All report purchases include up to 30 minutes telephone time with an expert analyst who will help you link key findings in the report to the business issues you’re addressing. This needs to be used within three months of purchasing the report.

CONTENTS

1. BASIC CONCEPTS, MARKET OVERVIEW AND DRIVERS.

1.1 Main Drivers

1.2 SSBR and SSBR-F Generations

1.3 Functionalization Technologies

1.4 Regulations and Labeling System drivers

1.5 Market Drivers: Light Vehicles OE and replacement tires

1.6 SSBR and SSBR-F Market Overview

2. INTRODUCTION: SSBR FOR HIGH-PERFORMANCE TIRES.

2.1 Tire Manufacturers unmet Needs  & Issues: Overview

2.2 Main Polymer types for HPT

2.3 Solution SBR vs. Emulsion SBR

2.4 Basic Concepts on High-Performance Tires (HPT)

2.4.1 Magic Triangle

2.4.2 Styrene-Vinyl Balance

2.4.3 Payne Effect

2.4.4 Rolling Resistance

2.4.5 Silica

2.4.6 Silane Coupling Agents

2.4.7 Reinforcing Nanofillers

2.4.8 Branching

2.4.9 Morphology and Viscoelastic Properties

2.4.10 Rheology Modifiers

2.4.11 Liquid additives (Rubbers)

2.5 Main Technology Trends

3. SSBR-F FUNCTIONALIZATION STRATEGIES.

3.1. Challenges

3.2. Basic Approaches

3.3. Non-Functionalized SSBR

3.4. Chain end Functionalized SSBR

3.5. Omega Functionalized SSBR

3.6. Alfa Functionalized SSBR

3.7. Alfa-Omega Functionalized SSBR

3.8. Along the Chain Functionalized SSBR

3.9. Other Approaches

4. SSBR-F RELEVANT TECHNOLOGIES AND COMPANIES.

4.1. General Overview

4.1.1. Annual Geographic Filing Strategy

4.1.2. Innovation Rate

4.1.3. Key Technology Fields Focus (IPC)

4.1.4. Important Patents and Evolution

4.1.5. Portfolio Analysis and valuation

4.1.6. Overview Cell Diagram

4.1.7 Overview – IP Strategy Bubble Maps

4.1.7. Overview Landscape Map

4.1.9 Evolution for HPT Art Patents

4.1.10 Conclusion

4.2. Trinseo

• Main product grades overview
• Synthetic Rubber generations
• Innovation Rate
• Annual Technology Filing Strategy
• Most Cited Patents
• Highest Market Valued Patents
• Cell Diagram
• Technology Landscape Map
• Technology Overview
• Main Functionalization Technologies

4.3. Michelin

• Main product grades overview
• Synthetic Rubber generations
• Innovation Rate
• Annual Technology Filing Strategy
• Most Cited Patents
• Highest Market Valued Patents
• Cell Diagram
• Technology Landscape Map
• Technology Overview
• Main Functionalization Technologies

4.4. Bridgestone

• Main product grades overview
• Synthetic Rubber generations
• Innovation Rate
• Annual Technology Filing Strategy
• Most Cited Patents
• Highest Market Valued Patents
• Cell Diagram
• Technology Landscape Map
• Technology Overview
• Main Functionalization Technologies

4.5. Continental

• Main product grades overview
• Synthetic Rubber generations
• Innovation Rate
• Annual Technology Filing Strategy
• Most Cited Patents
• Highest Market Valued Patents
• Cell Diagram
• Technology Landscape Map
• Technology Overview
• Main Functionalization Technologies

4.6. Goodyear

• Main product grades overview
• Synthetic Rubber generations
• Innovation Rate
• Annual Technology Filing Strategy
• Most Cited Patents
• Highest Market Valued Patents
• Cell Diagram
• Technology Landscape Map
• Technology Overview
• Main Functionalization Technologies

4.7. Arlanxeo

• Main product grades overview
• Synthetic Rubber generations
• Innovation Rate
• Annual Technology Filing Strategy
• Most Cited Patents
• Highest Market Valued Patents
• Cell Diagram
• Technology Landscape Map
• Technology Overview
• Main Functionalization Technologies

4.8 JSR

• Main product grades overview
• Synthetic Rubber generations
• Innovation Rate
• Annual Technology Filing Strategy
• Most Cited Patents
• Highest Market Valued Patents
• Cell Diagram
• Technology Landscape Map
• Technology Overview
• Main Functionalization Technologies

4.9 Asahi

• Main product grades overview
• Synthetic Rubber generations
• Innovation Rate
• Annual Technology Filing Strategy
• Most Cited Patents
• Highest Market Valued Patents
• Cell Diagram
• Technology Landscape Map
• Technology Overview
• Main Functionalization Technologies

4.10 Nippon Zeon

• Main product grades overview
• Synthetic Rubber generations
• Innovation Rate
• Annual Technology Filing Strategy
• Most Cited Patents
• Highest Market Valued Patents
• Cell Diagram
• Technology Landscape Map
• Technology Overview
• Main Functionalization Technologies

4.11. TSRC

• Main product grades overview
• Synthetic Rubber generations
• Innovation Rate
• Annual Technology Filing Strategy
• Most Cited Patents
• Highest Market Valued Patents
• Cell Diagram
• Technology Landscape Map
• Technology Overview
• Main Functionalization Technologies

4.12 Versalis

• Main product grades overview
• Synthetic Rubber generations
• Innovation Rate
• Annual Technology Filing Strategy
• Most Cited Patents
• Highest Market Valued Patents
• Cell Diagram
• Technology Landscape Map
• Technology Overview
• Main Functionalization Technologies

4.13 Kumho

• Main product grades overview
• Synthetic Rubber generations
• Innovation Rate
• Annual Technology Filing Strategy
• Most Cited Patents
• Highest Market Valued Patents
• Cell Diagram
• Technology Landscape Map
• Technology Overview
• Main Functionalization Technologies

5. FINAL REMARKS AND REFERENCES

Notice: Innventik SL reserves the right to modify the contents prior to final publication

 

With updated processes, traditional plants can achieve major improvements in terms of energy consumption, efficiency and productivity

Source: This article was published by European Rubber Journal. p.44-45. Ed. Nov-Dec. (2022).

http://www.european-rubber-journal.com/article/2070570/latest-issue-of-erj-magazine-now-available-online

Authors: Dr. Walter Ramirez, Jorge Campos (Innventik)

Companies and countries have announced ambitious goals to increase circularity, beyond their net-zero targets, and to become climate-neutral by 2050. In line with this target, the conservative elastomers and rubber industry must invest in technologies to support this goal.

Some of the process technologies still in place date back to the 1960s. The time has come to take processes and operations to the next level, through implementing best-practices for process improvement and innovative designs for sustainability.

Sustainability is driven by legislation, the positioning of customers in the value-chain and, increasingly, by pressure from end-market consumers. The industry will face a gradual increase in more rigid emissions-reductions requirements as more customers pursue net-zero strategies and demand zero-carbon materials-services.

This is good news because it will enable an acceleration in the adoption of existing and new process technologies to make our industry greener by optimising for maximum flexibility and performance, while minimising energy-consumption, emissions, waste, and costs.

This should also drive the implementation of emissions-reduction initiatives – such as via direct devolatilisation and thermal energy electrification – as well as the adoption of sustainability practices, including mass-balance, renewable raw materials-energies, and zero-residues.

There is, therefore, a clear opportunity for operators to revamp current processes towards providing more flexibility, differentiation, and cost-effectiveness, complying with today’s goals and regulatory challenges.

Moreover, these capex projects will not only reduce the impact of synthetic rubber production on the environment but also minimise community impacts, secure social licenses to operate, and reduce costs.

Solution polymerisation.

The solution polymerisation process –anionic, cationic, coordination to obtain SSBR, BR, SBS, SEBS, SEPS, SIS – offers unique possibilities and presents significant areas of improvement from the process perspective:

• Operation flexibility: Swing for batch, with the possibility to switch from rubber (i.e. SSBR) to elastomers (i.e. SBCs) in the same line.
• Solvent selection: The best solvent type must be properly selected depending on weather conditions, for low-energy solvent removal conditions, and also to enable crumb morphology control during the downstream process.
• Purification: The final product performance and quality, the polymer structure, and the process consistency depend directly on the purity of the raw materials. High monomer and solvent purity ensure high-purity blocks, structure control, and enhanced performance (differentiating against “commodity” type products). Improvements to column design and the number of stages can be implemented for maximum solvent recovery and highest purity, with low energy consumption. The designs must eliminate water traces (<1ppm moisture max.) and prevent column oversaturation, by implementing molecular sieves with an efficient regeneration system. These measures will lead additionally to the complete elimination of heavy species, to achieve greater consistency, lower emissions, and reduced cost.
• Reaction: A more efficient reactor design with an optimum agitation system with the right hydrodynamics for self-cleaning, to manage efficiently even at high solids content, with optimum heat transfer for maximum heat dissipation. The advanced reactor design must enable superior kinetic and polymer-structure control, employing (a) a catalyst or initiator titration system to ensure very precise additions; (b) a smart addition system for polar modifiers that will facilitate shorter cycles and increased productivity; (c) a control loop analysis system to follow the kinetics.
• Stripping: An optimised design and array to generate crumbs with low thermal history (to prevent colour and gel formation), has an optimised number of stages, with adjusted residence time, temperature, and additives for energy efficiency, enhanced water recovery, and fines reduction. An improved stripper geometry and agitation system, using eco-friendly additives, eases degassing, maximizes solvent recovery, and enables crumb morphology control.
• Finishing: Optimised crumb  feeding systems for maximum productivity, with special screw and cutter designs, control the density of bales, to obtain friable bales. High-density, porous (fluffy) crumbs can be controlled with the proper equipment and conditions. New shafts have been designed for expellers and expanders. The advantages of these shafts: (a) provide a net increase in process productivity (>10%); (b) avoid gel formation; (c) eliminate surging; (d) reduce fines; (e) reduce hopper back pressure; (f) stabilise the finishing line; (g) increase longevity.
• Direct devolatilisation: This type of process technology is focused on thermoplastic rubber and enables the elimination of the stripping and finishing stages to obtain the final product. Direct devolatilisation represents the next generation of finishing because of the advantages of energy, throughput, environmentally friendly, quality, consistency, and compact pellet. Energy savings (60%) vs. the steam stripping processes have been confirmed. Steam consumption reduction (60-80%), water consumption savings (99%), and overall energy savings (60%). The production of dense or porous pellets is possible through special devices. These technologies have increased in performance and are now capable of handling low and very high viscosities, stably, at high throughputs, and a reasonable cost. Limitations include polymer characteristics (especially with polymers of high molecular weight and low melt flow index), the removal of salts and additives, and the “porous crumb” feature.

Emulsion polymerisation

The emulsion polymerisation process – cold, hot, to obtain ESBR, NBR, HNBR, SB latex – has not evolved substantially, except for optimised compositions. Areas for significant improvements to the process include:

• Reactor: The new emulsion polymerisation reactor is designed to efficiently control kinetics at the highest solid content and minimize coagulum, and scaling, combining cryogenic and high-temperature features. The implementation of pre-emulsion, degassing systems, and online loops to control kinetics, particle size, and distribution, are possible. Flexible chain design allows batch-continuous operation, and efficient product switching. Implementing higher solids formulations is possible by using an optimum hydrodynamic system, feeding policies, and additives.
• Stripping: The first stripping process was patented in 1942 for emulsion polymers and is basically how most plants operate today. An optimised finishing and stripping to remove residual monomer with low thermal history have been proposed, with an optimised monomer purification for recycling with maximum quality. New, proven industrial designs for butadiene recovery using an advanced compression-condensation system and a flash-flash-decanter system for Styrene recovery have been successfully implemented. Novel designs to maximise monomer removal by combining the stripper with spray nozzles connected to a distillation column (in the same equipment) have been proposed. Technologies for continuous coagulation-washing-dewatering-drying (i.e. self-cleaning, intermeshing kneaders with twin-screws, biaxial extruder barrel,) have been implemented.
• Concentration: The new emulsion polymerisation design can handle latex formulations up to 60-63% solids. This can be achieved by optimising the design, formulation, and conditions of the thin-film evaporator.

Fundamental transformation

The drive to enhanced sustainability will require a fundamental transformation of the elastomer and rubber industry: assessing and reducing environmental impact offers both great opportunities and great challenges.

Companies must, therefore, take action to decarbonise profitably, by exploring technological options for new processes to achieve sustainability goals, embracing a bold new vision of the future based on sustainable- and safe-design process technologies.

Implementation of best process and operational practices for more flexible, modular cost-effective synthetic rubber production with reduced environmental impact  requires a mindset change to build a “green business.”

About the authors:

Walter Ramirez and Jorge Campos are co-founders of Innventik, a consulting and engineering firm that assists customers worldwide, to design processes, accelerate commercialisation & innovation projects. With bases in Spain and Mexico, Innventik services ranges from engineering process assessment, FEED and EPC to business development and technology-market Intelligence in areas including elastomers, polymers, nanotech,  for adhesives, technical compounds and tires. The firm’s recent/ current projects in the synthetic rubber industry include a 100 kilotonnes per annum (ktpa) Nd butadiene rubber plant – start-up this year – and a 60ktpa SSBR & SSBR-F plant scheduled for start-up in 2023.

Lisbon, September 20, 2022. Innventik was honored to speak at the Annual General Meeting 2022 of the International Institute of Synthetic Rubber Producers (IISRP). Dr. Walter Ramirez presented the conference “Sustainability in the Operating Plant through Advanced Process Technology”.

SUMMARY.

Companies and countries are to become climate neutral by 2050. In line with this target, the industry must work on process improvement and innovative designs for sustainability. The industry will face a gradual increase of more rigid emissions-reductions requirements as more customers pursue net-zero strategies and demand for Zero-Carbon Materials-Services. This will enable the acceleration of the adoption of existing and new process technologies to make our industry greener. Companies are increasingly open to implementing new process technologies and sustainable practices to reduce costs, minimize community impacts, and secure their social license to operate. During the conference, Innventik presented a summary of the most updated process technologies for Solution and Emulsion Polymerization (including Raw Materials Purification, Reactor Design, Stripping, Coagulation, Direct Devolatilization, Latex Stripping, Facility Lifetime, and Corrosion Monitoring). At Innventik, we see an opportunity to revamp current processes to provide more flexibility and cost-effectiveness, to implement the best operative practices, and comply with regulatory challenges. The time has come to take traditional Processes and Operations to the next level.

Madrid, Spain, July 1, 2022. Innventik has launched a global campaign to promote Innventik Engineering, a firm specialized in Chemicals, Polymers, Elastomers and Rubber, by offering complete suite of Engineering Firm Services: FEL2, FEL3, FEED, PDP, BEDP, EPC, Basic, Detail Engineering and Process Assessments. Since 2016 Innventik Engineering has designed new plants and improved multiple processes for relevant customers in Germany, Japan, Spain, Italy, Mexico, Peru, and China. The specialized engineering firm’s policy is to offer top Engineering, at the best price-quality ratio, with the shortest lead times.

info@innventik.com