Innventik

Unlocking the Power of Advanced and Sustainable Process Practices.

Innventik designs and revamps plants 20240430

 

Innventik is an Engineering and Consulting firm specializing in Polymers, Elastomers, and Rubber. We assist companies in the design and repositioning of products for multiple applications. Our engineering team is equipped with the latest software, led by engineers with decades of experience in the design of chemical plants.

Innventik is at the forefront of designing and revamping industrial plants, integrating advanced and sustainable process technologies. Our mission is clear: to push industries towards the adoption of sustainable process operations across various sectors, including chemical, polymer, rubber, and elastomer plants. We firmly believe that this transformation goes beyond mere equipment updates; it entails revolutionizing industry practices from the ground up.

In today’s world, where sustainability is paramount, the need for these advancements has never been more pressing. The global trend towards investing in “green” technologies is accelerating at an unprecedented rate. Yet, many industrial operations continue to rely on outdated processes conceived decades ago. Many companies and countries have announced their goals to increase circularity, beyond their net-zero targets. In line with the target of get to net zero by 2050, the industry must work on process improvement and innovative designs for sustainability to achieve this goal.  Sustainability is driven by legislation, the positioning of our customers in the value chain, and increasingly by the pressure from end consumers.  The world is therefore on track to exhaust its “carbon budget,” the amount of greenhouse gases it can emit without triggering dangerous levels of warming, by 2030. The industry will face a gradual increase of more rigid emissions-reduction requirements as more customers pursue net-zero strategies and demand for Zero-Carbon materials services.

 

  • China leads net-zero efforts in Asia, aiming to reach peak greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060. After 2030 new chemical plants in China will be very difficult to justify.
  • China has stretched its dual-control policy and introduced more policies to reduce energy and emissions, which will have significant implications.
  • Japan and South Korea are targeting net zero by 2050 and in general, companies keep announcing their emission-reduction plans.

 

All this will accelerate the adoption of existing and new process technologies to make our industry greener.

 

  • There is an opportunity to upgrade current processes, to allow for considerable flexibility, cost-effectiveness, by implementing the “best” operative practices, to minimize emissions, leaking, wastes and costs.
  • Innventik’s research revealed that TPE & elastomer companies are increasingly open to implement new process technologies and sustainable practices to minimize community impacts.
  • A recent McKinsey report found that reaching net zero by 2050 will entail a 60% increase in capital spending in sustainable physical assets vs. pre-pandemic levels.

 

One example on how Innventik supports the elastomer and rubber industry is designing ad-hoc systems to replace the traditional steam stripping process to recover polymer from solution polymerization, for direct devolatilization processes. Direct Devolatilization enables savings of about 60% vs. steam stripping processes, has increased in performance, and is now capable of handling low and very high viscosities, stably, at high throughputs, and a reasonable cost. Direct Devolatilization represents the next generation finishing because of the advantages of energy, throughput, ecological, quality, consistency, and compact pellet. Limitations are associated with the polymer characteristics (especially with high MW and Low MFI polymers), the removal of salts and additives, and the “porous crumb” feature.

We have performed a tech. intelligence study of the different technologies available. We have supported a number of solutions of this type, with bespoke designs and with the support of available equipment manufacturers’ designs.

Another example is the implementation of advanced process practices in Emulsion polymerization, where we have identified significant areas of improvement. In reaction to implementing systematically higher solids with the optimum hydrodynamic system to ensure minimum coagulum and smooth operation. An optimized finishing and stripping to remove residual monomer with low thermal history. And an optimized monomer purification for recycling with maximum quality.  The new emulsion polymerization reactor designed by Innventik efficiently controls the kinetics at the highest solid content and minimizes coagulum and residual monomers. Implementing pre-emulsion, degassing systems and online loops to control kinetics, particle size, and distribution, are also implemented. The spirit of our design in emulsion polymerization processes is to implement formulations in processes capable of handling up to +60 % solids latex, which we have achieved by implementing the right formulations, process practices and a special type of evaporator.

At Innventik, we recognize that process technology is at a critical intersection. We understand the urgency to maintain competitiveness and market relevance by embracing more sustainable processes. This recognition drives our commitment to integrating cutting-edge reaction and separation technologies into every aspect of plant design.

Our approach is holistic. We focus on reshaping the very foundation of industrial processes, from innovative reactors and fermenters to novel separation techniques. Flexibility is key to our designs. Our new plant configurations are engineered to seamlessly transition between continuous and batch modes, offering unparalleled agility in production.

Whether it’s designing a pilot, semi-industrial, or industrial-scale facility, our team of experts is dedicated to helping clients take their plant operations to the next level. We offer comprehensive assessments and implement the most advanced process practices tailored to each client’s needs.

In conclusion, the sustainable and safe design of process technologies presents both a great opportunity and a challenge for industries worldwide. As the global demand for sustainable raw materials continues to rise, driven by the imperative to reduce environmental impact, extend service life, and improve recyclability, the need for innovative solutions becomes increasingly urgent.

Key industry drivers, including legislation and regulations, pressure from OEMs, customer positioning, and demands from end-consumers, underscore the importance of addressing both product and process sustainability. Embracing this challenge requires a shift in mindset towards building a bold “green business” vision for the TPE industry and beyond.

At Innventik, we recognize the imperative of integrating the best process and operational practices to create more sustainable process plants. Our commitment extends beyond mere technological advancements to fostering a culture of innovation and sustainability. By working collaboratively with our clients, we aim to lead the way towards a future where sustainability is not just a goal, but a fundamental principle guiding every aspect of industrial operations. Together, let us embrace this opportunity to revolutionize the way we design, operate, and envision the future of industrial processes. Let us build a world where sustainability and innovation go hand in hand, creating lasting value for the future.

The future of industrial processes lies in sustainability and innovation. At Innventik, we’re committed to leading this charge toward a brighter, more sustainable future. Contact us today to learn more about how we can revolutionize your operations and pave the way for a more sustainable tomorrow.

 

Merry Christmas and Happy 2024 from Innventik

Innventik Christmas Card 2023

Innventik Tech Intelligence Report: SSBR-F Technologies for High Performance Tires

Frontpage SSBR-F Report


slide 1 legislation

 

slide 17 bridgestone map

 

slide 20 cell map asahi

 

slide 3 carbon silica

 

Slide 4 hysteresis

 

Slide 5 Trends

 

Slide 6 Alfa omega styron

 

Slide 7 End capping goodyear

 

slide 11 spider tires

 

slide 10 innovation rate general

 

slide 12 landscape general

 

slide 13 map trinseo

 

slide 14 map trinseo 2

 

slide 20 cell map asahi

 

Technology Overview: Solution SSBR Functionalized (SSBR-F) Technologies for High-Performance Tires 2019

Innventik Technology Intelligence Report

By Dr. Walter Ramirez

 

Introduction: SSBR for High-Performance Tires (HPT).

SSBR use in Tires is expanding as low rolling resistance tread applications increase into both high and mid-performance consumer tires as well as commercial tires. Portfolio of products for global tire market is expanding towards High-Performance tires. To reduce emissions targets, automotive manufacturers must reduce a vehicle’s emissions during its life-span. Tire manufacturers are targeting LRR & HPT, as reflected in the market & technology trends. LRR relevance has increased worldwide because of an eco-friendly fuel consumption reduction, and CO2 emissions trend. The report reviews the basic concepts for High-Performance Tires (HPT), regulations, Magic Triangle Low Rolling Resistance challenges and design parameters.

 

SSBR Functionalization Strategies.

SSBR Functionalization strategies include Chain end Functionalization (Omega-Functionalized, Alfa-Functionalized, Alfa-Omega Functionalized) and Along the Chain Functionalization. Specific technology for tailored macrostructures and a full range of polymer microstructures (Tg). are being designed, with multiple functionality variations. End-chain Functionality products are still the dominant products in the market. Functionalization along the chain (and combined) improves the efficiency of dispersion of silica and carbon-black, but might generate collateral issues with crosslinking and filler interaction. The use of chemical coupling improves processing and performance balance. Oil extension for a mix of tire performance and processing properties are relevant.

 

SSBR-F Relevant Technologies and Companies.

The technology dashboards for SSBR-F Technologies and Companies (Trinseo, Michelin, Bridgestone, Continental, Goodyear, Arlanxeo, JSR and Asahi) are presented (Innovation Rate, Annual Technology Filing Strategies, Most Cited Patents, Highest Market Valued Patents, Cell Diagrams, Technology Landscape Maps, Relevant Technologies and Patent Lists, per company).

 

CONTENTS

 

1. Introduction: SSBR for High-Performance Tires (HPT).

1.1. Tire Manufacturers unmet Needs & Issues: Overview
1.2. Tire Manufacturers Regulations and Labeling System
1.3. HPT Basic Concepts
1.3.1. Magic Triangle
1.3.2. Styrene-Vinyl Balance
1.3.3. Main Polymer Types
1.3.4. Rolling Resistance
1.3.5. Reinforcing Nanofillers & Silanes
1.3.6. Morphology and Viscoelastic Properties
1.3.7. Rheology Modifiers
1.3.8. Liquid Rubbers
1.3.9. Elastomer Nanocomposites
1.3.10. Sustainable Monomers
1.3.11. Technological Trends

 

2. SSBR-F Functionalization Strategies.

2.1. Challenges
2.2. Basic Approaches
2.3. Non-Functionalized SSBR
2.4. Chain end Functionalized SSBR
2.5. Omega Functionalized SSBR
2.6. Alfa Functionalized SSBR
2.7. Alfa-Omega Functionalized SSBR
2.8. Along the Chain Functionalized SSBR
2.9. Other Approaches

 

3. SSBR-F Relevant Technologies and Companies

3.1. General Overview
3.1.1. Annual Geographic Filing Strategy
3.1.2. Innovation Rate
3.1.3. Technology Focus (IPC)
3.1.4. Important Patents and Evolution
3.1.5. Portfolio Analysis and valuation
3.1.6. Overview Cell Diagram
3.1.7. Overview Landscape Map

 

3.2. Trinseo
3.2.1. Main product grades overview
3.2.2. Synthetic Rubber generations
3.2.3. Innovation Rate
3.2.4. Annual Technology Filing Strategy
3.2.5. Most Cited Patents
3.2.6. Highest Market Valued Patents
3.2.7. Cell Diagram
3.2.8. Technology Landscape Map
3.2.9. Technology Overview
3.2.10. Main Functionalization Technologies

 

3.3. Michelin
3.3.1. Innovation Rate
3.3.2. Annual Technology Filing Strategy
3.3.3. Most Cited Patents
3.3.4. Highest Market Valued Patents
3.3.5. Cell Diagram
3.3.6. Technology Landscape Map
3.3.7. Relevant Patent List

 

3.4. Bridgestone
3.4.1. Main product grades overview
3.4.2. Innovation Rate
3.4.3. Annual Technology Filing Strategy
3.4.4. Most Cited Patents
3.4.5. Highest Market Valued Patents
3.4.6. Cell Diagram
3.4.7. Technology Landscape Map
3.4.8. Relevant Patent List
3.4.9. Technology Overview
3.4.10. Main Functionalization Technologies

 

3.5. Continental
3.5.1. Innovation Rate
3.5.2. Annual Technology Filing Strategy
3.5.3. Most Cited Patents
3.5.4. Highest Market Valued Patents
3.5.5. Cell Diagram
3.5.6. Technology Landscape Map
3.5.7. Relevant Patent List
3.5.8. Main Functionalization Technologies

 

3.6. Goodyear
3.6.1. Innovation Rate
3.6.2. Annual Technology Filing Strategy
3.6.3. Most Cited Patents
3.6.4. Highest Market Valued Patents
3.6.5. Cell Diagram
3.6.6. Technology Landscape Map
3.6.7. Relevant Patent List
3.6.8. Main Functionalization Technologies

 

3.7. Arlanxeo
3.7.1. Innovation Rate
3.7.2. Annual Technology Filing Strategy
3.7.3. Most Cited Patents
3.7.4. Highest Market Valued Patents
3.7.5. Cell Diagram
3.7.6. Technology Landscape Map
3.7.7. Relevant Patent List
3.7.8. Main Functionalization Technologies

 

3.8. Asahi
3.8.1. Innovation Rate
3.8.2. Annual Technology Filing Strategy
3.8.3. Most Cited Patents
3.8.4. Highest Market Valued Patents
3.8.5. Cell Diagram
3.8.6. Technology Landscape Map
3.8.7. Relevant Patent List
3.8.8. Main Functionalization Technologies

 

3.9. Nippon Zeon
3.9.1. Innovation Rate
3.9.2. Annual Technology Filing Strategy
3.9.3. Most Cited Patents
3.9.4. Highest Market Valued Patents
3.9.5. Cell Diagram
3.9.6. Technology Landscape Map
3.9.7. Relevant Patent List
3.9.8. Main Functionalization Technologies

 

3.10. TSRC
3.10.1. Innovation Rate
3.10.2. Annual Technology Filing Strategy
3.10.3. Most Cited Patents
3.10.4. Highest Market Valued Patents
3.10.5. Cell Diagram
3.10.6. Technology Landscape Map
3.10.7. Relevant Patent List
3.10.8. Main Functionalization Technologies

 

3.11. JSR
3.11.1. Innovation Rate
3.11.2. Annual Technology Filing Strategy
3.11.3. Most Cited Patents
3.11.4. Highest Market Valued Patents
3.11.5. Cell Diagram
3.11.6. Technology Landscape Map
3.11.7. Relevant Patent List
3.11.8. Main Functionalization Technologies

 

3.12. Conclusion.

 

3.13. References

 

ORDERING INFORMATION

 

To request a copy of this report:

info@innventik.com
Europe: +34 628859711
America: +52 5538758395

□ Electronic (1-5 users) 7495,00€
□ Electronic (6-10 users) 9995,00€

 

An electronic version of a fully illustrated report, 285 pages, PDF format, will be delivered after payment.

 

ACCESS TO INNVENTIK EXPERTS

 

All report purchases include up to 30 minutes telephone time with an expert analyst who will help you link key findings in the report to the business issues you’re addressing. This needs to be used within three months of purchasing the report.

 

Notice: Innventik SL reserves the right to modify the contents prior to final publication

innovation forum picture wr3

Innventik present at Innovation Forum Euskadi 2018

Innventik present at Innovation Forum Euskadi 2018

Bilbao, Spain, November 9, 2018 –Innovation Forum  seeks to build bridges between academia, industry and policy makers. Dr. Walter Ramirez participated at the Innovation Forum Euskadi 2018 “Building Bridges between the clinical and technological worlds”, and had the honor to meet with personalities like Dr. Alan Barrell (Cambridge University), Dr. Chris Lowe (Cambridge University), Dr. Ipsita Roy (Westminster University), Dr. Yolanda de Miguel (Tecnalia), among others.